a turquoise flower

I came across something interesting tonight. It made me think about what kind of writer I am. I generally do write in my comfort zone- as I'm sure most other people do.

Well, this interesting tidbit was about this person writing outside of their comfort zone. And I applaude that. I think it takes some serious guts to go and try to write something one doesn't necessarily write.

The thing with me is that I do not have those serious guts- about anything let alone trying to write things I normally don't. It's sort of ironic because I'll read almost anything (bar anything rated above PG-15, of course), but to actually sit down and write almost everything I read would be, well, quite impossible. And I don't think it's all nervousness that's stopping me either, of course that plays a large part, but it's also the having-no-plotbunny that hinders the writing as well.

But, I firmly believe that with practice, it'll be easier for me to write whatever comes and to not be so censored in what I try to write. Because if I did that, I'd think I'd be a fierce, prolific writer--it'd also probably help if I wasn't so lazy and faffing about the internet most of the time, instead working on my writing. But, eh....

****

I was watching Naruto tonight (as I always do--major loyal fan) and I think I seriously squee'd over the interactions between Pakkun and Ton-Ton, and if you're not a fan of/familiar with Naruto, Ton-Ton is a pig, and Pakkun is a dog...

...yeah, but seriously, Ton-Ton is such a cute piggy with her white pearls around her neck, and her oink-oinks, and the two cute animals would be so cute together!~~ (Well, if Pakkun can talk...certainly a pig and a dog could be romantic together...)

I just want to rant a bit about books that're turned into movies.

So, has anyone here read those T*Witches books by H.B. Gilmour and Randi Reisfeld? Well, I loved them in elementary school and in 2006, I think it was, Disney Channel made a movie based on the books. Only it wasn't really a T*Witches movie, but something completely different that just had the same names as the two major characters in the book and the same premise (two twin sisters who find each other and do magic to battle evil).

I was disappointed, to say the least, that the movie wasn't as good as the books. I just wish that the people who created the movie really made a T*Witches movie, and not just an adaptation that was similiar to the books. I really wish that there was a movie for the books because I thought the books were pretty good and I would've liked to see a movie based on them... I dunno I guess I'm just saying that the movie disappointed me severly because it was so flat and cheesy. Not one character was the same as their book counterparts and they lacked characterization. I know it's Disney and it's for kids, but I truly believe that the movie could've been made a bit better and still retained that innocence for its audience. I was so excited when they annouced the movie, but it really didn't hold up to my expectations and that's what makes me feel so hopeless. (Also, I was thinking of something I heard RTD say once about how he wanted to make his new adaptation of Doctor Who good so that kids who saw it would know what was good and demand that of their television as they got older, but Disney is so counteracting what RTD is trying to do with his Doctor Who that it makes me feel hopeless for the kids who watch Disney but don't watch DW; did I say that I was feeling hopeless about this situation? It bears repeating, honestly.)

And I also think that they could have the movie be exactly like the books because the books aren't that long (it's not like they're HP length where they have to cut out almost everything).

It's a moot point, isn't? Because the movie people never listen and they take liberties with making books into movies when fans clearly don't like those liberties the movie people take! I understand that when making a book into a movie that some things have to be different because most movies run for only two hours, but they can have the major points/plots the same. Fans will be receptive to that, honestly. Otherwise, what's the point of making a book into a movie if you're going to change everything? Then don't say it's based on a book or it's this book turned into this movie because then the fans will get pissed off. Seriously. It's okay if a book inspires you, but if you change everything when you make that book into the movie, doesn't it not become a movie adaptation of that book? It becomes something clearly different. Something clearly bad.

(Oh, btw, the mouse problem is solved. Fast, I know. I have the best parents in the world. They ran off to the store this morning and brought me a wireless mouse, so that when I woke up [at 1pm, embarrasing really], everything was working- and for only $26. It's not too bad.)